CLOSE
Leave a comment

FILE- Judy Scott, center, Walter Scott's mother, is comforted by her son Rodney Scott, as the family attorneys, Chris Stewart, left, and Justin Bamberg, right, hold a press conference after the mistrial was declared for the Michael Slager trial Monday Dec. 5, 2016, in Charleston, S.C. Former patrolman, Slager, is charged with murder in the shooting death of Walter Scott last year. (AP Photo/Mic Smith, File)

 

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — The video was unambiguous: A white police officer fatally shot an unarmed black man in the back as the man ran away.

But a South Carolina jury was unable to agree on a verdict in one of the nation’s ghastliest police shootings, with a lone holdout forcing a mistrial. The outcome stung many African-Americans and others. If that kind of evidence can’t produce a conviction, they asked, what can?

“There’s a jury full of people and they cannot decide if it’s illegal to shoot someone who is running away from you?” said activist Johnetta Elzie. “What do you say about a country that feels this way about black people? If you can’t see the humanity in that, I don’t know what we’re talking about anymore.”

Prosecutors plan to retry officer Michael Slager, who is scheduled to be tried separately next year on federal charges that he violated Walter Scott’s civil rights.

North Charleston city officials approved a $6.5 million civil settlement for Walter Scott’s family earlier this year. Slager remains free on bail.

South Carolina Republican Gov. Nikki Haley voiced her support for Scott’s family, saying in a statement that justice “is not always immediate, but we must all have faith that it will be served.”

Scott, 50, was killed in April 2015 after he was shot five times. A barber on his way to work recorded the slaying on his cellphone.

The panel of 11 white jurors and one black juror deliberated for 22 hours. At one point, a juror sent a letter directly to the judge saying he could not “with good conscience approve a guilty verdict” and that he was unlikely to change his mind. As they weighed their decision, jurors also asked the judge to explain the legal difference between fear and passion and inquired whether the self-defense standard was the same for officers as ordinary citizens.

NAACP President Cornell Brooks called the jury’s decision “a disappointing delay in the delivery of justice.” Hours after the mistrial, a tweet from three Black Lives Matter co-founders said, “Some days the hashtag is too painful to participate in.”

Elzie, one of the first protesters in Ferguson, Missouri, after the fatal 2014 shooting of Michael Brown by a white officer, said word of the hung jury left her numb.

“When it comes to justice and black people in America, I don’t expect it,” she sighed.

Randall Kennedy, a black Harvard University law professor and author of several books on race relations, had difficulty reconciling the law with the mistrial, which he called “frightening.”

“It appeared as though it was open and shut,” said Kennedy, a native of Columbia, South Carolina. “Obviously, this is a case of some criminal action on the part of this police officer. Is it at all plausible that you have a man running and a police officer says, ‘I’m firing in self-defense?'”

He added: “It’s at this point that people are truly exasperated and say, ‘Do we really have anything that can seriously be called the administration of criminal justice?’ Can we reach people? Are people even persuadable?”

On the day after the mistrial, Charles Witherspoon sat in the main library in Columbia, reading the newspaper. He followed the trial closely and is well-versed in the facts of the case, like the 17 feet that separated Scott and the officer when he began firing at Scott.

Witherspoon, who is black, had no doubt Slager was guilty of murder, but the mistrial did not come as a surprise. It’s an outcome the 54-year-old South Carolina native has come to expect.

“Murder is murder — unless you are a police officer,” he said. “Someone is always going to find a way out for a police officer.”

National Action Network South Carolina President James Johnson urged people to give the second trial a chance before they get angry. He said he heard rumors of people threatening to “burn” Charleston, but he does not think it will happen.

“I urge the people to let the justice system take its course. Let’s wait on the next trial before we decide to do anything stupid. We’ve got to live here. We don’t want people coming from outside of Charleston” to protest, said Johnson, who is black.

Kennedy said the retrial points to the belief that the initial result was wrong.

“It’s a good thing that people are paying a lot of attention to this and that they are shocked,” he said. “What will really be terrible is when something like this happens, and people are not shocked.”

___

Whack covers urban affairs for The Associated Press and reported from Philadelphia. Seanna Adcox contributed to this story from Charleston, South Carolina.

–>

 PHOTO: AP

Like BlackAmericaWeb.com on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

Also On Black America Web:
Find Out What Your Favorite Celebs Did On Instagram (09/01-09/07)
10 photos

3 thoughts on “Questions, Disbelief After Mistrial In Walter Scott Shooting

  1. Darrell Hartley on said:

    THE CUSTOMS OF ISLAM “ORIGINATE” FROM THE HEBREW ISRAELITES- ISUPK HEBREW ISRAELITES

    CHRISTIANS “DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT LOVE MEANS” ACCORDING TO THE BILE-ISUPK HEBREW ISRAELITES

  2. Anthony B.... on said:

    When I heard about the make up of the jury I knew a mistrial was forthcoming and with Ronald the Donald coming to D.C. next month I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for federal charges on civil rights violations being applied…

  3. Opportunity lost is a lost opportunity. In a year the Att Gen will be Sessions what are the chances either a retrial in the state or the Fed trail will put this killer cop in prison? Again, I have to say the Prosecution dropped the ball here. They and the lawyers for the family should NEVER have allowed this jury of 11 whites and one black to occur. The shame and loss rest on your shoulders. I certainly hope you have not charged the family for this inexcusable work.

Add Your Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s