Leave a comment

CHICAGO (AP) — Two mothers who lost sons to gun violence joined ministers and an activist group Tuesday in an unusual lawsuit against three Chicago suburbs, alleging that weak oversight of gun stores has allowed criminals to easily obtain weapons flowing into a metropolitan area besieged by gang violence.

The lawsuit accuses the communities of Lyons, Riverdale and Lincolnwood of violating the civil rights of residents in Chicago’s largely African American neighborhoods by failing to take steps to make sure gun stores are not selling to people who should not be allowed to carry them.

“Those illegal firearms are flowing into a pocket of communities violating the civil rights of the individuals who reside there, who are afraid to go near their windows or let their children play in the park, much less their own yards,” said Kathleen Sances, a member of the Coalition for Safe Chicago Communities, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

Five individuals — including two ministers and two mothers whose children were the victims of gun violence — joined the lawsuit that demands that the communities improve the oversight of the businesses and implement security measures the stores must implement.

Seven people were shot to death in Chicago during the three-day Fourth of July weekend, including 7-year-old Amari Brown, focusing national attention on the city’s gun violence and statistics showing the number of homicides and shootings has again climbed.

One of the plaintiffs is Annette Nance-Holt, whose son Blair was killed in 2007 shielding a friend on a city bus after a gang member boarded and opened fire on a rival group.

“Our communities are being flooded with guns,” she said. “We have to do something… to take a stand to help get these guns off the street.”

Attorney Michael Persoon said he knows of no other similar lawsuit in Illinois and does not know of anywhere else in the country where a lawsuit has been filed alleging that municipalities violated someone’s civil rights by failing to adequately oversee the actions of local businesses.

A gun rights advocate agreed, though he called the lawsuit as a twist on a longstanding attack on gun owners.

“It’s is just another harassment lawsuit,” said Richard Pearson, the executive director of Illinois State Rifle Association. “They found the gun shops did nothing wrong so they are trying to put pressure on the communities to do something that will drive (the stores) out of business.

Though the city of Chicago is not a party in the lawsuit, Lyons Village President Christopher Getty said in a statement released by a public relations firm characterized the lawsuit as an effort by Chicago to “pass the blame onto outside communities and businesses for the crimes and short-comings in dealing with crimes” in the city. An official with Lincolnwood declined comment, and a call to Riverdale was not returned.

Though they sued the communities and not the stores themselves, members of the group pointed to a Chicago Police Department study that showed that between 2009 and 2013, 2,000 guns sold in the stores in Riverdale and Lyons were used in crimes.

But, they said that they can dramatically reduce the flow of illegal guns into their communities if the three suburbs are required to do such things as install surveillance cameras and train employees on how to stop straw purchasers who buy legally guns and provide them to criminals.

Like on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

(Photo Source: AP)

Also On Black America Web:
Find Out What Your Fav Celebs Did On Instagram This Week (02/02-02/08)
10 photos

5 thoughts on “Chicago Group Sues 3 Suburbs Over Gun Store Regulations

  1. Linda on said:

    The gun industry is a major $$$ maker in the US of A.

    Whether it is a local gun dealer selling six or more hand-guns at a time to a single person(straw purchaser) or those gun shows that REDNECKS love to attend it’s all about $$$.

    The NRA will never allow any meaningful gun legislation to be drafted/enacted because they have donated way too much $$ to the GOP and no doubt some DEMS.

    • MacBen on said:

      but the rednecks aren’t shooting and killing us; it’s us shooting and killing us! Don’t fault the gun- it has been around for hundreds of years; fault the person who uses the gun with criminal intent.

  2. jhuf on said:

    So if I’m hit by a drunk driver I should sue the manufacture of the car he’s driving or the entity that sold it to him? In crime ridden areas throughout big city’s we railed against enhanced policing (stop and frisk) programs to help curb street crime and violence
    this is the result NYC Baltimore Chicago if a criminal knows there’s a good chance the gun he has will be discovered if he carries it on the street, more likely to leave it at home less likely to shoot someone’s son or daughter out in the streets, don’t get me wrong I’m not for indiscriminant unrestricted gun purchasing or position but suits like these are nothing and go nowhere it’s been tried many times effective policing does prevent crime

  3. I said it. on said:

    The site owners know what’s happening, but just want to line their pockets. These families are doing what they have to to improve their communities. I don’t blame them.

Add Your Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

&pubUrl=[PAGE_URL_ENCODED]&x=[WIDTH]&y=[HEIGHT]&vp_content=plembeddf3ixunshlvk&vp_template=3854" ]