Don’t drag President Barack Obama’s daughters into the debate over guns.

Just when I thought the National Rifle Association couldn’t sink any lower – it did.

The NRA released a shameless video ad this week that references Obama’s daughters, Sasha and Malia, and links the girls to Obama’s $500 million plan to reduce gun violence in America.

“Are the president’s kids more important than yours?” the narrator says in the ad.

The ad questions why Obama is critical of the NRA’s proposal to post armed guards in public schools while his own children receive U.S. Secret Service protection. The NRA calls Obama an “elitist hypocrite” and features a child’s lunchbox with the seal of the President of the United States.

“Attacking firearms and ignoring children is not a solution to the crisis we face as a nation,” the NRA said in a statement. “Only honest, law-abiding gun owners will be affected and our children will remain vulnerable to the inevitability of more tragedy.”

If the NRA wants to go after Obama, that’s fair game – but to make a case for gun rights by using Obama’s daughters in a low-class ad is shameful. It’s been widely accepted that the president’s children are off limits for political posturing, sort of a gentleman’s agreement. But clearly there are no gentlemen in the NRA – and they don’t play by the rules.

Using Obama’s children as political pawns? Seriously? The girls are 14 and 11 years old. And associating Obama’s daughters with the politics of gun laws after the shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, that claimed the lives of 20 children, is just downright despicable.

It doesn’t get any lower than this.

“Most Americans agree that a president’s children should not be used as pawns in a political fight,” said Jay Carney, the White House press secretary. “But to go so far as to make the safety of the president’s children the subject of an attack ad is repugnant and cowardly.”

Earlier this week, Obama announced a $500 million plan to curtail gun violence. The president announced 23 executive measures that include empowering schools to hire police officers, bolster research on gun violence, and improve efforts to prosecute gun crimes. The president will also ask Congress to expand background checks on gun buyers.

But Barbara Arnwine, President and Executive Director of The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said she is especially interested in how the United States’ policies and laws on gun control impacts communities of color.

“The tragedy at Sandy Hook was an unfortunate reminder that something needs to be done about gun violence and gun control as of yesterday,” Arnwine said is a statement. “Our inner cities and communities of color have been experiencing gun violence and deaths on an unparalleled basis for a very long time, and we can no longer wait to act.”

Arnwine said she is heartened to Obama making gun control a priority as he begins his second term, adding that African Americans are far more likely to be a victim of gun violence in America than whites.

And she pointed to the following statistics:

•       The Children’s Defense Fund Protect Children, Not Guns 2012 reports that in 2008 and 2009, black children and teens accounted for 45 percent of all child and teen gun deaths, but were only 15 percent of the total child population. Gun homicide was the leading cause of death among black teens between the ages of 15 and 19.

•       African Americans living in urban metros are more likely to die of gun violence than their white counterparts.  For example, 80 percent of the 324 people killed in Philadelphia in 2011 were killed by guns, three-quarters of whom were black.

•       According to the U.S. Census, young African American men die of gun homicide at a rate eight times greater than that of young white men, and at a rate 2.5 times higher than Hispanic males.

•       While the homicide rate is declining in our country, the number of black male victims increased by 10 percent from 5,307 in 2000 to 5,942 in 2010.

Wayne LaPierre, the chief executive and vice president of the N.R.A., wants to post armed police in the nation’s public schools – a notion that is strongly opposed by civil rights groups, educators, congressional leaders, and the Lawyers Committee.

“The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun,” LaPierre said at a recent press conference.

LaPierre is entitled to his opinion, warped as it may be, but shouldn’t LaPierre leave Obama’s children out of the discussion?

(Photo: AP)

Also On Black America Web:

8 thoughts on “NRA, Leave Obama’s Children Alone

  1. I’d like to see the NRA do a similar ad questioning why we are all concerned about the 4 elitist politicians that died at Bengazi and not about the 14 average American citizens that died from fungal meningitis contaminated vaccines. I mean an embassy in an occupied country should be more protected than mere Americans at home?

  2. It is funny how most blacks support the democrat party and fight the Republicans and the NRA when the Republicans started because the party wanted to free the slaves, and pass the Civil Rights Act when it was powerful rich Democrats that was fighting it. The NRA was started by Union Generals after the Civil War to fight for equal protection of blacks from the KKK (which was started and mostly ran by Democrats).
    Blacks support the Democrat party and believes in abortion, but it is a proven fact that almost 2/3 of abortions are black women killing black babies. If the trend doesn’t stop, then black Americans willpractically wiped out by 2050. Very sad.
    Wake up American! Stop Abortion! Stop the Democrat party. More of us should leave the Dems and support Republicans!!

  3. Pingback: TALK BACK: BAW’s Top Comments of the Week | Black America Web

  4. Telling Truth on said:

    I say use all children of political leaders in ads since the precedent has been set with President Obama. I could think of a few politicians that should be used.

  5. My letter to Chris Christie this morning:

    Dear Mr. Christie,

    At first I was impressed with your taking on the establishment and especially the teacher’s union in an effort to balance the budget in New Jersey.

    But in more recent times, I have been much less impressed with your “romantic” walk on the beach with “Our Dear Leader”, your whining for more money for New Jersey (I didn’t ask anyone to live there; bail your own selves out) all the while the “help bill” was overflowing with pork, your attack on Romney for telling the truth about the 47%, which we found out was really the 51% (and don’t blame me, I was a Cain guy).

    And now this total poppycock about abusing the children of politicians, specifically Obama’s children, by the NRA – the only thing “reprehensible” is Obama abusing and using the children as pawns and props for political purposes.

    The NRA add does not attack Obama’s children but merely points out that he is indeed an “elitist hypocrite”. Your behavior on the other hand is politically reprehensible to me. And your desires to be the new “darling of the GOP” has fallen weakly at my knees. It seems after all the initial fanfare, you are nothing but yet another capitulating and appeasing RINO, a la Bob Michel, looking for a dollar to bring back home. I cannot trust you for higher office, for your mistakes are mounting way too fast. I do hope you seek redemption and again return to the fold of conservatism and common sense.

  6. All schools should be protected to the extent that is needed to keep children safe from mad men, regardless of the skin color of the children that attend. Certain districts in Texas have begun to allow teachers to carry concealed weapons so that they have the option to carry a gun, and perhaps thwart the attempts of a mad man from harming children. It is DCs strict gun laws preventing this type of protection in DC schools.

  7. Cindy Cruz on said:

    Hypocricy is sending your kids to an ALL white Private school protected by armed guards while not allowing the ALL black schools in DC to have the same protection.

  8. Upset about the NRA using Obama’s children as political pawns, but say nothing about Obama using other people’s children as political pawns to further his anti-gun political agenda. Typical liberal hypocrisy.

Add Your Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s