3 Reasons “RoboCop” Remake Will Never Live Up To The Original [REVIEW]

Comments: Comments Are Disabled  | Leave A Comment
  • advertisement
  • It’s never easy trying to make a successful movie remake, but that hasn’t stopped Hollywood from cranking them out.  Director Jose Padhila takes on the 1987 classic “RoboCop,” which starred Peter Weller as a fresh-faced street cop gunned down on his first day of duty, only to be resurrected as a fearsome human-machine hybrid created to clean up the streets of Detroit.


    In this update,  Murphy (Joel Kinnaman)  is a “Dirty Harry” type police detective who messes with the wrong crime boss, Antoine Vallon (Patrick Garrow).  When Vallon strikes back, leaving Murphy at death’s door, OmniCorp CEO Raymond Sellars (Michael Keaton) finds his perfect guinea pig for a new type of law enforcement.

    While this remake certainly benefits from the bells and whistles of CGI (that black suit is the business!), ultimately “RoboCop” fails to live up to its predecessor.  Here are three reasons why this RoboCop 2.0 will never find a place in the sci-fi hall of fame:

    1. Joel Kinnaman

    While Kinnaman is undoubtedly  easy on the eyes, his performance barely had a pulse.  What made Weller’s RoboCop so compelling was his evolution from an idealistic police officer to bad ass crime fighter.  His transition from man to machine was informed with specific body movements and vocal intonations, whereas Kinnaman’s interpretation remained flat throughout.  The magic to “RoboCop” was the audience taking an emotional journey with Alex Murphy, as he painfully reconciled his humanity within his cybernetic body.  Kinnaman unfortunately fails to take us to the promised land. I mean, if you can’t even deliver the classic line “Dead or alive, you’re coming with me” with any conviction, you’re simply not worthy of carrying on the “RoboCop” legacy.

    1 2Next page »

    Tags: » » » »


    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 3,667 other followers