CNN’s John King showed the worst kind of journalism Wednesday when he made controversial racial assumptions and falsely reported on-air that the suspect in the deadly Boston Marathon bombings was a “dark-skinned male.”

King was wrong and irresponsible.  Law enforcement officials immediately refuted King’s report and, in fact, CBS News reported that the suspect is a “white male.”

As a seasoned journalist, and a black man, I am outraged – and offended — that King would recklessly single out all men of color as the terrorist suspect.

“I want to be very careful about this, because people get very sensitive when you say these things,” King said Wednesday. “I was told by one of these sources who is a law enforcement official that this is a dark-skinned male.”

He said that there had been a further description given, but he was refraining from sharing it with viewers.

“There are some people who will take offense for even saying that,” King said. “I understand that.”

“We can’t say whether the person spoke with a foreign accent, or an American accent?” Wolf Blitzer asked. “That would be premature.”

King repeated that he was only going to use the “dark-skinned male” description, saying that sometimes information did not turn out to be true.

“I’m making a personal judgment—forgive me, I think it’s the right judgment—not to try to inflame tensions,” King said. “They say it’s a dark-skinned male.”

Who said it was a “dark-skinned male?” A law enforcement source?

Monday’s blasts killed 8-year-old Martin Richard, of Boston, and 29-year-old Krystle Campbell, of Medford, Mass. On Wednesday, CBS News confirmed that the third fatality has been identified as Lu Lingzi, a 23-year-old graduate student at Boston University from Shenyang, China.

In the rush of trying to get a “scoop” on the case, King showed terrible judgment. Within seconds on air, King essentially turned every male of color a bombing suspect. King was wrong and he should apologize on-air.

“Dark-skinned male?” Rev. Sharpton asked on his MSNBC Show “Politics Nation.” “Coded, offensive language.  These comments are very offensive. They have no place in our discourse.”

“What King’s words did is to make every dark-skinned male in Boston a suspect, and that’s shameful,” Sharpton added.

Sharpton is right.

The investigation is ongoing and the situation in Boston is tense and what Boston doesn’t need right now are journalists making racial assumptions and adding to an already stressful situation.

Earlier this week, a plane from Boston headed to Chicago was brought back to the gate at Logan Airport, after some passengers — who also participated in the marathon — expressed concern over two men, who were apparently not sitting next to each, were speaking in Arabic. The men were escorted off the plane.

And now, King is pointing the finger at men of color.

“Disturbing that it’s OK for TV to ID a Boston bombing suspect only as ‘a dark-skinned individual,’ ” PBS anchor Gwen Ifill tweeted about King.

Meanwhile, The National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) said King’s reporting was “offensive.”

“There have been various reports identifying a potential suspect as “a dark-skinned individual,” NABJ said in a statement. “This terminology is not only offensive, but also offers an incomplete picture of relevant facts about the potential person of interest’s identity. When conveying information for the public good, and which can help law enforcement with the help of a vigilant public to keep the country safe, it’s important that such facts be put into proper context.”

Let’s hope John King gets the message and thinks before he injects “dark-skinned male” into his reporting.

(Photo: AP)

Also On Black America Web:

10 thoughts on “CNN’s John King Falsely Calls Boston Bomb Suspect ‘Dark-Skinned Male’

  1. greatone on said:

    John King is basically a joke. Since Newt Handed him his butt doing the debate He has lost all kinds Of credibility.

  2. John King is a disgrace to CNN. I had chills yesterday when he said it and cited a reliable source. The conversation wasn’t about the culprits race or origin and from nowhere, he started talking about a black male as the perpetrator. It could have been anybody but he’s emphasis shows how biased and racist he is. If you not black, you don’t know how it feels to be black.

  3. Ella, the large majority of white people (including you) will never, ever get it when a person of color has been targeted. If you have never stood in those shoes and experienced that feeling, you should probably keep your opinions to yourself. It shows a lack of knowledge and an abundance of ignorance.

  4. Well commentators on MesNBC were hoping the bomber was an “old white guy”
    turns out they appear to be young Chechnyan’s possibly white Muslims

  5. So if the suspect wAs a “white male” should all the white people be offended? Are you people kidding me! You are all racists. You should all apologize for bringing in race in ever single issue!

  6. John King needs to make a public apology to every dark skinned male who he made an instant target for possible retribution for something they had no part in. I am finally finished with CNN. They are in the same league as FOX.

  7. wilie kishi on said:

    just before I looked at the receipt ov $6082, I didn’t believe that…my… brother woz like actualie erning money part-time on their laptop.. there neighbor started doing this 4 only 21 months and resently paid for the morgage on there villa and got a great new Fiat Multipla. we looked here, ……….. http://ow.ly/kcMOs

Add Your Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

×