Leave a comment

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump‘s threat to stop billions of dollars in government payments to insurers and force the collapse of “Obamacare” could put the government in a legal bind.

Law experts say he’d be handing insurers a solid court case, while undermining his own leverage to compel Democrats to negotiate, especially if premiums jump by 20 percent as expected after such a move.

“Trump thinks he’s holding all the cards. But Democrats know what’s in his hand, and he’s got a pair of twos,” said University of Michigan law professor Nicholas Bagley. Democrats “aren’t about to agree to dismantle the Affordable Care Act just because Trump makes a reckless bet.”

For months, the president has been threatening to stop payments that reimburse insurers for providing required financial assistance to low-income consumers, reducing their copays and deductibles.

Administration officials say the decision could come any day.

Playing defense, some insurers are preemptively raising premiums for next year. For example, BlueCross BlueShield of Arizona this week announced a 7.2 percent average hike for 2018. But there would likely be no increase if the subsidies are guaranteed, the company said. And BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina earlier requested a 22.9 percent average increase. With the subsidies, the company said that would have been 8.8 percent.

The “cost-sharing” subsidies are under a legal cloud because of a dispute over whether the Obama health care law properly approved the payments. Other parts of the health care law, however, clearly direct the government to reimburse insurers.

With the issue unresolved, the Trump administration has been paying insurers each month, as the Obama administration had done previously.

Trump returned to the subject last week after the GOP drive to repeal the health care law fell apart in the Senate, tweeting, “As I said from the beginning, let ObamaCare implode, then deal. Watch!”

He elaborated in another tweet, “If a new HealthCare Bill is not approved quickly, BAILOUTS for Insurance Companies…will end very soon!”

It’s not accurate to call the cost-sharing subsidies a bailout, said Tim Jost, a professor emeritus at Washington and Lee University School of Law in Virginia.

“They are no more a bailout than payments made by the government to a private company for building a bomber,” he said.

That’s at the root of the Trump administration’s potential legal problem if the president makes good on this threat.

The health law clearly requires insurers to help low-income consumers with their copays and deductibles. Nearly 3 in 5 customers qualify for the assistance, which can reduce a deductible of $3,500 to several hundred dollars. The annual cost to the government is about $7 billion.

The law also specifies that the government shall reimburse insurers for the cost-sharing assistance that they provide.

Nonetheless, the payments remain under a cloud because of a disagreement over whether they were properly approved in the health law, by providing an “appropriation.”

The Constitution says the government shall not spend money without a congressional appropriation.

Think of an appropriation as an electronic instruction to your bank to pay a recurring monthly bill. You fully intend to pay, and the money you’ve budgeted is in your account. But the payment will not go out unless you specifically direct your bank to send it.

House Republicans trying to thwart the ACA sued the Obama administration in federal court in Washington, arguing that the law lacked specific language appropriating the cost-sharing subsidies.

A district court judge agreed with House Republicans, and now the case is on hold before the U.S. appeals court in Washington. A group of state attorneys general asked the court earlier this year to let them join the case in defense of the subsidies, and on Tuesday the court agreed. House Republicans had opposed the states’ participation, but the court said the group had “demonstrated the appropriateness of their intervention in this case.”

Both Bagley and Jost have followed the issue of the payments closely, and disagree on whether the health law properly approved the payments to insurers. Bagley says it did not; while Jost says it did.

However, the two experts agree that insurers would have a solid lawsuit if Trump stops the payments. Insurers could sue in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, which hears claims for money against the government.

“The ACA promised to make these payments — that could not be clearer — and Congress has done nothing to limit that promise,” said Bagley.

“I think there would very likely be litigation if the Trump administration tries to cut off the payments,” said Jost.

Another way to resolve it: Congress could appropriate the money, even if temporarily, for a couple of years. Some prominent GOP lawmakers have expressed support for that.

If the president makes good on his threat, experts estimate that premiums for a standard “silver” plan would increase by about 19 percent. Insurers could recover the cost-sharing money by raising premiums, since those are also subsidized by the ACA, and there’s no question about their appropriation.

But millions of people who buy individual health care policies without any financial assistance from the government would face prohibitive cost increases.

And more insurers might decide to leave already shaky markets.

“This is not a game,” said California Attorney General Xavier Becerra. “Millions of people would not be able to afford health insurance for their families.”

Like on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter and Instagram

Share your email below to receive our daily newsletter!


Also On Black America Web:
The Ten Most Interesting Little Known Black History Facts
10 photos

8 thoughts on “Trump Faces Legal Hurdles to Stop Obamacare

  1. Guest on said:

    Joe Gonzales on August 2, 2017 at 10:33 am said:….”We have to start our own construction businesses our own lawn caring businesses are owned restaurants along laundry services we have to start servicing our community…. Where the hell have you been? Just last week a cop in Texas arrested a young black man for handing out his business cards for lawn care. i.e. mowing grass. If I’m not mistaken, the cop even came back to the guys house and unleashed the police dog on him. I can’t co-sign on that other bs you’re talking about black people not liking to be black, etc. Please speak for yourself. Don’t know what part of the country you’re in, but here in the northeast, there are a lot of black owned businesses. The entrepreneurial spirit is good here. Stop the negativity about black people and post something positive.

  2. Joe Gonzales on said:

    I think we as my people are too preoccupied about President Donald Trump. Who gives a care what he’s doing with Russia or not doing with Russia. How does that benefit of black people? We are always dragged into fights among white people and we do all the dirty work and at the end of the day we get nothing. What are we gaining getting involved with all this crap. We need to take care of ourselves first. When Donald Trump got elected president disguised and follow the world in catch on fire the buildings in America than falled apart the stock market did not collapse you are still alive you still got a job so what difference did they actually make? My answer to you is none. The black man is still getting killed by police black people are still being thrown in jail just like they were when Obama was in power when George Bush was in power when Ronald Reagan was in power all the way back to Abraham Lincoln’s day and Beyond. So Black America or brothers and sisters we need to ask ourselves what is your purpose in America? We need to focus on ourselves we have to start liking being black. We have to start our own construction businesses our own lawn caring businesses are owned restaurants along laundry services we have to start servicing our community. Black Americans have an economical power in excess of one and a half trillion dollars which means we would be the 7th or 8th largest economy in the world as black people. Why the hell don’t we have that piece of the pie at least we can help each other and derive some benefits internally within our community and Elevate are canonical conditions. Government has failed us for five hundred years presidents have failed as for five hundred years so now it’s time to take care of ourselves it doesn’t matter whether you have a black senator of black mayor of black Governor or black president we’ve gone through that root several times now we need to find a new way to get our ass together

  3. Uh, didn’t the U.S. Supreme Court make the Affordable Health Care Act law? (They only put “Obamacare” as the name of it to make it a negative spin so that those that opposed President Obama anyway would have a reason to feel it needed to be repealed) For 8 years they sit on every piece of law and/or legislation that President Obama tried to put through (mostly for the good of US citizens) and now all of a sudden they’re is a mad rush to get everything through. Stay woke folks. Everything they do must be scrutinized and fought on every turn.

  4. specialt757 on said:

    The site of this man just makes my skin crawl. The sound of his voice makes me want to throw up. I can’t stand the fact that he is this country’s president, he is clearly unfit and unstable. He should be institutionalized and be made to undergo psychiatric evaluations no less than 3 times a week and his twit account be disabled.

  5. If it ain’t broke-why try to fix it????

    The Idiot-in-Chief and the GOP are beating a dead horse when it comes to successfully repealing the Affordable Care Act.

    One would think that if they cannot obtain the amount of votes needed to override Obamacare that their dumb asses would move on to another agenda-but no………….

    They are wasting time and the peoples patience with this issue.

    The main reason why Chump and that POS McConnell want to get rid of the ACA is because it
    was created by President Obama.

    Second, the ACA provides affordable health insurance coverage to poor folks.
    We all know that the GOP does not give two red cents about the poor-they are all about
    keeping things status quo and looking out for the rich!!!!!!!!!!!

    Time to move on- or as the ole folks would say-“time to s—t or get up off the pot.”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Add Your Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s