PLAY AUDIO
Jacque Reid goes “Inside Her Story” with Bruce Zimet, the attorney representing Marrissa Alexander, the woman who received twenty years in prison after firing a warning shot into her ceiling despite it not harming or killing anyone.
2 thoughts on “What’s the Difference Between the Marissa Alexander Case and the Zimmerman Case?”
Add Your Comment
-
‘Queen Sugar’ Episode Recap: ‘Daddy’s Blues’ -
Sure Would Be Great If Black Victims Of White Cops Got The Love, Support, And Justice Of Justine Damond -
Jenifer Lewis Wins Settlement From LA Fitness -
Michael Jackson Estate Has To Pay Quincy Jones $9.4 Million -
Man Rapes A 14-Year-Old To Only Serve 180 Days In Prison -
Top Of The Morning: Who’s Trying To Rob Sherri?
The differences between the case are night and day:
1) Zimmerman had forensic evidence to support him; Alexander didn’t.
2) Zimmerman had eyewitness testimony; Alexander didn’t.
3) Zimmerman had six witnesses verifies his cries for help on THE 911 tape; Alexander didn’t.
4) Zimmerman actually called 911; Alexander didn’t.
5) Zimmerman had video and photos of his injuries; Alexander didn’t.
6) Zimmerman cooperated with the police; Alexander didn’t.
7) Angela Corey had to bend and break the law to arrest Zimmerman; Corey went by the book to arrest Alexander.
How’s that?
We all know what the difference is already!