PLAY AUDIO
Jacque Reid goes “Inside Her Story” with Bruce Zimet, the attorney representing Marrissa Alexander, the woman who received twenty years in prison after firing a warning shot into her ceiling despite it not harming or killing anyone.
2 thoughts on “What’s the Difference Between the Marissa Alexander Case and the Zimmerman Case?”
Add Your Comment
-
Wendy Williams Announces Return Date To Talk Show -
Toya Wright Claps Back At Online Trolls Insulting Her Youngest Daughter -
Essence ‘Women In Hollywood Event’ Celebrates Established And New Stars -
Why Brothers In Alleged Smollet Hoax Likely Won’t Face Charges -
WATCH: Police Provide Details Of Smollett Plans For Attack -
Regina King Stunned Journalist Didn’t Know Who She Was
The differences between the case are night and day:
1) Zimmerman had forensic evidence to support him; Alexander didn’t.
2) Zimmerman had eyewitness testimony; Alexander didn’t.
3) Zimmerman had six witnesses verifies his cries for help on THE 911 tape; Alexander didn’t.
4) Zimmerman actually called 911; Alexander didn’t.
5) Zimmerman had video and photos of his injuries; Alexander didn’t.
6) Zimmerman cooperated with the police; Alexander didn’t.
7) Angela Corey had to bend and break the law to arrest Zimmerman; Corey went by the book to arrest Alexander.
How’s that?
We all know what the difference is already!