PLAY AUDIO
Jacque Reid goes “Inside Her Story” with Bruce Zimet, the attorney representing Marrissa Alexander, the woman who received twenty years in prison after firing a warning shot into her ceiling despite it not harming or killing anyone.
2 thoughts on “What’s the Difference Between the Marissa Alexander Case and the Zimmerman Case?”
Add Your Comment
-
Tessa Thompson Says She Caught Michael B. Jordan Looking At Her Butt [Video] -
Quincy Brown Is ‘Broken’ After Losing His Mother Kim Porter; Diddy Hosts Memorial -
Jimmy Kimmel Gets Michelle Obama To Say Things She Couldn’t Say As First Lady [Video] -
Pastor Under Fire For Kicking Cross-Dressing Male Member Out Of Church Service -
Is Porsha’s Fiance A Player? -
Dallas Austin Reveals ‘Drumline’ Movie Was About He And Kim Porter’s Romance
The differences between the case are night and day:
1) Zimmerman had forensic evidence to support him; Alexander didn’t.
2) Zimmerman had eyewitness testimony; Alexander didn’t.
3) Zimmerman had six witnesses verifies his cries for help on THE 911 tape; Alexander didn’t.
4) Zimmerman actually called 911; Alexander didn’t.
5) Zimmerman had video and photos of his injuries; Alexander didn’t.
6) Zimmerman cooperated with the police; Alexander didn’t.
7) Angela Corey had to bend and break the law to arrest Zimmerman; Corey went by the book to arrest Alexander.
How’s that?
We all know what the difference is already!