PLAY AUDIO
Jacque Reid goes “Inside Her Story” with Bruce Zimet, the attorney representing Marrissa Alexander, the woman who received twenty years in prison after firing a warning shot into her ceiling despite it not harming or killing anyone.
2 thoughts on “What’s the Difference Between the Marissa Alexander Case and the Zimmerman Case?”
Add Your Comment
-
Keyshia Cole Talks Co-Parenting With Booby & Brooke Valentine -
Malia Obama Could Find Herself In The Middle Of The Weinstein Drama -
The ‘Black Panther’ Trailer And New Photos Are Here -
Huggy Lowdown: $10 Million For Information To Impeach Donald Trump -
About The Weekend: When The Doctor Got It In! -
Roland Martin: Colin Kaepernick’s Grievance Is A Strong Case Against The NFL
The differences between the case are night and day:
1) Zimmerman had forensic evidence to support him; Alexander didn’t.
2) Zimmerman had eyewitness testimony; Alexander didn’t.
3) Zimmerman had six witnesses verifies his cries for help on THE 911 tape; Alexander didn’t.
4) Zimmerman actually called 911; Alexander didn’t.
5) Zimmerman had video and photos of his injuries; Alexander didn’t.
6) Zimmerman cooperated with the police; Alexander didn’t.
7) Angela Corey had to bend and break the law to arrest Zimmerman; Corey went by the book to arrest Alexander.
How’s that?
We all know what the difference is already!