NY Court Weighs ‘Too Drunk’ Murder Defense

Comments: 0  | Leave A Comment
  • advertisement
  • ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Three people convicted of murder in deadly crashes urged New York’s highest court Tuesday to throw out their convictions, arguing they were too intoxicated to know the threat they posed to others.

    The murder convictions of Martin Heidgen, Taliyah Taylor and Franklin McPherson all hinge on the prosecution’s contention they acted with “depraved indifference to human life” in fatal crashes that share a number of common threads: driving too fast in the wrong lane while under the influence.

    Defense attorneys argued prosecutors failed to prove their clients acted with depraved indifference and, in fact, their clients were too impaired to know what they were doing.

    Heidgen’s attorney, Jillian Harrington, said her client had gotten lost when he drove his pickup the wrong way on Long Island’s Meadowbrook State Parkway in 2005 and hit a limousine, killing the driver, Stanley Rabinowitz, and 7-year-old passenger Katie Flynn and injuring five others.

    “We have no proof he realized he was going in the wrong direction,” she told the Court of Appeals.

    Heidgen had a blood alcohol content of 0.28 percent, police said. Now 32, he’s serving 19 years to life in prison.

    “This is a question of fact for the jury,” Nassau County Assistant District Attorney Maureen McCormick countered.

    McCormick urged the court to uphold the juries’ conclusions in the cases of Heidgen and McPherson, who was involved in a 2007 crash on Long Island’s Southern State Parkway. McPherson hit another vehicle, killing driver Leslie Burgess. His BAC was 0.19 percent. Now 26, he’s serving 25 years to life in prison.

    “I’m saying they wanted to go where they wanted to go, and other people be damned,” McCormick said. Since there’s always substantial traffic in Nassau County, there’s “no possibility” the drivers didn’t know the threat, she said.

    McPherson’s attorney, Jonathan Edelstein, said evidence showed his client didn’t attempt to brake before the crash, so unless prosecutors were to argue he was suicidal —which they didn’t — “that would have to mean he was oblivious.”

    1 2 Next page »


    • More Related Content


    Add Your Comment

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s