PGA Embarrassed by ‘Lee Daniels’ The Butler’s 41 Producers

Comments: 4  | Leave A Comment
  • advertisement
  • When it comes to producers’ credits, the most newsworthy movie of the moment is definitely “Lee Daniels’ The Butler,” which has drawn media attention for having more than 40 different credited producers.

    “I wish that there weren’t so many producer credits on this picture, because it is a little embarrassing for everyone within our community,” said Producers Guild of America co-president Mark Gordon in an interview with TheWrap. “But I do understand that there’s very little that someone won’t do to get a movie made. And in the end, if you look at that movie and you appreciate what its message is, and you weigh what they had to do and what they ended up with, I get it.”

    Most of the credited producers are in the executive-producer and associate-producer categories, with IMDb listing seven associate producers, six co-producers, 18 executive producers and four co-executive producers. Only five – Daniels, Cassian Elwes, Buddy Patrick, Pam Williams and Laura Ziskin – receive the actual “Produced by” credit, and those five have yet to go through the vetting process that would result in the Producers Mark.

    If the film is nominated for any awards, though, they will be.

    “It will be arbitrated, and if it gets nominated we’ll announce who the real producers are,” said PGA co-president Hawk Koch.

    And although Ziskin died in 2011, before the film went into production, he added, she is in a good position with the guild: “This was Laura’s project.”

    1 2 Next page »


    • More Related Content


    4 thoughts on “PGA Embarrassed by ‘Lee Daniels’ The Butler’s 41 Producers

    1. 41 producers, talk about over kill. Is the academy going to have to made that many statuettes in the event this movie wins out in all the Oscar catagories? What they need to do is go old school, one statuette, the producers take turns keeping it in their houses and if it gets broken, they chip in to buy a replacement.

    2. Maybe if the industry had backed the film he wouldn’t have needed that many “producers”. I have no problem with the people that helped this film come to light being named becasue they were needed to make it happen. So, if they get their props by getting a “producer” title then so be it.

    3. Most of these so called “producers” are in name only, and that being because they may have conrtibuted on the financial end or brought in someone who contributed.

      It is like writers getting “producers” credit due to their deal with the union some time back. They actually do not produce the show.

      Most of these types have no clue of how to produce a film or TV show. They are there in name only.

      Although I am happy the film was made, it really is a shame that they had to have all those “producers” in the credits.
      No good deed goes un-punished.

    Add Your Comment

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

    You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s