NY Case Puts N-word Use Among Blacks on Trial

Comments: 25  | Leave A Comment
  • advertisement
  • NEW YORK (AP) — In a case that gave a legal airing to the debate over use of the N-word among blacks, a federal jury has rejected a black manager’s argument that it was a term of love and endearment when he aimed it at a black employee.

    Jurors awarded $30,000 in punitive damages Tuesday after finding last week that the manager’s four-minute rant was hostile and discriminatory, and awarding $250,000 in compensatory damages.

    The case against Rob Carmona and the employment agency he founded, STRIVE East Harlem, hinged on the what some see as a complex double standard surrounding the word: It’s a degrading slur when uttered by whites but can be used at times with impunity among blacks.

    But 38-year-old Brandi Johnson told jurors that being black didn’t make it any less hurtful when Carmona repeatedly targeted her with the slur during a March 2012 tirade about inappropriate workplace attire and unprofessional behavior.

    Johnson, who taped the remarks after her complaints about his verbal abuse were disregarded, said she fled to the restroom and cried for 45 minutes.

    “I was offended. I was hurt. I felt degraded. I felt disrespected. I was embarrassed,” Johnson testified.

    The jury ordered Carmona to pay $25,000 in punitive damages and STRIVE to pay $5,000.

    Outside court after her victory, Johnson said she was “very happy” and rejected Carmona’s claims from the witness stand Tuesday that the verdict made him realize he needs to “take stock” of how he communicates with people he is trying to help.

    “I come from a different time,” Carmona said hesitantly, wiping his eyes repeatedly with a cloth.

    “So now, now you’re sorry?” Johnson said outside court, saying she doubted his sincerity and noting Carmona had refused to apologize to her in court last week. She said he should have been sorry on March 14, 2012, “the day when he told me the N-word eight times.”

    Her lawyer, Marjorie M. Sharpe, said she hoped the case sent a strong message to those who “have tried to take the sting out of the N-word. … It’s the most offensive word in the English language.”

    Carmona left the courthouse without immediately commenting, as did all eight jurors.

    In a statement, STRIVE said it was disappointed but was exploring its options, including an appeal and looking forward to the “judicial process taking its entire course.”

    It also cited Johnson as a “prime example of the second chances that STRIVE provides to both its participants and nonparticipants alike.”

    It noted that Johnson, who was never a STRIVE participant, was employed there despite a previous conviction for grand larceny that required her to pay about $100,000 in restitution. The judge barred lawyers from telling jurors about the conviction.

    In closing arguments, Sharpe had said Carmona’s use of the word was intended to offend “and any evidence that defendants put forth to the contrary is simply ridiculous.”

    1 2Next page »

    Tags:

    • More Content

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 2,322 other followers