NYC Mayor Lambastes Stop-and-Frisk Ruling

Comments: 2  | Leave A Comment
  • advertisement
  • NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge’s stinging rebuke of the police department’s stop-and-frisk policy as discriminatory could usher in a return to the days of high violent crime rates and end New York’s tenure as “America’s safest big city,” Mayor Michael Bloomberg warned.

    The ruling strikes at the heart of the legacy Bloomberg aims to leave when his third and final term ends this year. He said he would appeal but likely won’t be around long enough to deal with the repercussions.

    “This is a dangerous decision made by a judge who I think does not understand how policing works and what is compliant with the U.S. Constitution as determined by the Supreme Court,” Bloomberg said. “I worry for my kids, and I worry for your kids. I worry for you and I worry for me. Crime can come back any time the criminals think they can get away with things. We just cannot let that happen.”

    U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin declared Monday that police have intentionally and systematically violated the civil rights of tens of thousands of people by wrongly targeting black and Hispanic men.

    She appointed an outside monitor to oversee major changes to the tactic, including reforms in policies, training and supervision. And she ordered a pilot program to test body-worn cameras in the some of the precincts where most stops occurred.

    “The city’s highest officials have turned a blind eye to the evidence that officers are conducting stops in a racially discriminatory manner,” she wrote. “In their zeal to defend a policy that they believe to be effective, they have willfully ignored overwhelming proof that the policy of targeting ‘the right people’ is racially discriminatory.”

    But Bloomberg said police have done exactly what the courts and constitution allow to keep the city safe, reiterating the tactic was one tool that has helped drive down crime to record lows. The ruling could result, he said, in a return to the days of crime and mayhem, when murders hit an all-time high of 2,245 in 1990. Killings hit an all-time low of 418 in 2012.

    Scheindlin refused to hear testimony on crime rates, and her ruling skewered the city’s defense of the practice and argument that it effectively polices itself.

    1 2 Next page »

    Tags: » »

    • More Related Content


    2 thoughts on “NYC Mayor Lambastes Stop-and-Frisk Ruling

    1. Actually, it is the guys who take the train, walk and commute who get frisked the most. your point is well taken however. Blooomberg has and never, ever will have any idea on the atrocious humiliation it feels to have this done to you. He is only barking because this judge exposed his dirty deeds.

    2. I wonder sometimes if folks like Mayor Bloomberg were ever subjected to these over the top measures if they would still think they were great ideas. Safe to say neither he nor is family members and most likely his friends have never been singled out for an unnecessary “Stop and Frisk”. I also noticed that he kept referring to it as “Stop, Question and Frisk” during his rant yesterday. I suspect not a lot of questions are being asked during these stops and if they are they are likely to be more of an accusation vs. a question. I have a nephew who moved to NYC recently, and what is saving him for this inhumane treatment is that he didn’t take his car with him. Taking the train may be help him a little bit for now.

    Add Your Comment

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

    You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s