Court Says Defamation Suit by Sherrod Can Go On

Comments: 2  | Leave A Comment

O’Connor’s lawyers had argued to have the case dismissed under a District of Columbia statute that aims to prevent the silencing of critics through lawsuits. The statute is called anti-SLAPP, or “strategic lawsuit against public participation.”

A federal district court judge rejected their motion to dismiss, citing timing and jurisdictional issues, prompting the appeal. The appeals court affirmed that O’Connor’s lawyers missed the deadline for filing the dismissal request.

In March arguments, the lawyers told the court of appeals that O’Connor and Breitbart, before he died, stood by the content, saying the blog post was opinion.

“What happened here is what happens in journalism every day,” said Bruce Brown, a lawyer for O’Connor.

Sherrod’s lawyers disagreed and said dismissal under the District of Columbia statute would violate their right to a trial.

The case has been closely watched as a test of the District of Columbia’s anti-SLAPP statute.

(Photo: AP)

« Previous page 1 2

Tags: »

  • More Related Content

Comments

2 thoughts on “Court Says Defamation Suit by Sherrod Can Go On

  1. If you think Stephen`s story is really cool,, 1 week ago my girl friends mom actually earned $9442 just sitting there a fourty hour month in their apartment and there roomate’s step-mother`s neighbour did this for five months and easily made over $9442 parttime on- line. use the instructions available on this page……. http://tiny.cc/bqi9yw

Add Your Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s